Last week we outlined directive leadership; what it means, what forms it takes, and when it is used. We were careful to point out that directive leadership, although task driven, isn’t the only or the best way to sustain momentum within an organization. Sometimes it can force an organization to produce unexpected results and, on other occasions, it can smother employee motivation and drive.
Leaders who are opposed to directive leadership’s main tenants and rely on reflection and adaptable priorities can be considered facilitative leaders. Facilitative leadership is used to sustain momentum by meeting challenges without a set action plan. Facilitative leaders value creativity, reflection, and brain storming over planning, commands, and efficiency. Again, facilitative leadership isn’t the right fit for some people and some organizations. While it might produce results for one set of people it might create apathy and inefficient work habits within another.
Here are 10 signs you are a facilitative leader:
1.You have the capacity to make adjustments: As a facilitative leader you aren’t afraid to change plans, ideas, and strategies.
2. You put emphasis on people’s ability to reflect and innovate: You trust your peers and employees to be able to create new solutions and ideas in creative ways.
3. You want people to feel confidant in their ability to adjust plans and solve problems: Not only do you trust people to think outside the box, you actively work to instill confidence within your peers and employees.
4. You feel that people will find ways to avoid inertia: You assume that your employees will fight stagnation by proposing new ideas, challenges, and agendas.
5. You assume most people are self-motivated and appreciate challenges: You think that everyone around you works hard and wants to succeed.
6. You are not afraid of uncertainty: When faced with a new problem you are confidant it can be solved by your innovative team.
7. You think organizations are networks, not hierarchies: You feel that everyone is a team member and has a equal say while you disregard traditional chain-0f-command discipline.
8. You don’t mind risk and you don’t feel alone: You assume that your staff and yourself can handle or maneuver problems deftly.
9. You aim to maximize spontaneity and adaptability: You encourage forward thinking, new ideas, and a ever-changing organizational structure.
10. You don’t value routine, controlled systems, and measurement: Instead of focusing on the numbers and tangible tasks your are motivated by visionary, adaptive ideas.
The facilitative leader can help an organization confront uncertainty, challenges, and stagnation. However, facilitative leaders run the risk of getting side-tracked and overwhelmed with a visionary idea. Without focus and a eye for measurement, implementation becomes challenging, if not impossible. Facilitative leaders might be the first to innovate, but the last to produce real-world results
Thanks for your vote...
If you voted in the World Leadership Gurus Top 30, the Hub's founder, Phil Dourado, came 14th this year (2012), up three places from 17th last year. The organisers say it is "because of the originality and impact of your work" that Phil was put in the Top 30 in the first place. And that means this Hub and the award-winning corporate versions we run for large companies. For more on how a private corporate version of The Hub works, email: phildourado@theleadershiphub.com
Facilitative or Direction led leadership
That's fascinating. Thank you for that. One thing I struggle with understanding clearly sometimes is reconciling the need to be authentic - your 'true' self as a leader - with the fact that different situations can demand different types of leadership. I guess someone's natural style may be 'facilitative', but they may need to be directive sometimes. And vice versa. I know 'situational leadership' teaches this adaptability - lead people differently at different times based on the need and even on the type of person you are dealing with - some respond better to a 'type' of leadership, regardless of what your own natural 'type' is, and so maybe you need to switch into 'what works' rather than 'who you naturally are'. Can anyone help me make more sense of that, as it's a bit of a tangled knot in my head at the moment - the apparent contradictions buried in there.
Contingency rather than situational
I have also had similar thoughts. One thing that helped was reading around Contingency Theory. This says, very basically, that different leadership styles will work well or badly depending on the amount of positional versus referred power a leader has, whether the organisation or work is process driven or free form, and whether the relationship between leader/manager and followers is good or bad. There is an instrument that tries to show if you are a more people orientated or more task orientated leader, and which type of situations a particular score on that instrument suggests you would do well in.
This is kind of an extension to the situational model, in that you have to be able to understand what is going on around you (where you are, and how things work), as well as the individual or group that you are trying to lead from one quadrant to the next using the situational model. Indeed, the Situational model is one that you would consider using if you wanted to change the people in an effort to change the culture or the work process, thus changing the 'what is going on around you' part.
I am drawing here from Peter Northouse's book, because it is a simple read, but I am also sure that there are other sources as well.
Not much help in the short term I know, but a trip to the library and a bit more research may help to clear a bit of the mud from the water.
Regards,
Colin.
p.s. One of the reasons I like Mr Northouse's book so much is because it examines so many of the different models, so that you can get a sort of first impression of each, but also see where they overlap, how they interact.